China recently announced an end to the placement of its children for international adoption, after some 30 years of doing so. There have been a wide variety of responses about the decision. As you look for more information, be sure to look first for the voices of the experts: Chinese adoptees.
As is often the case, media information about adoption often promotes the voices of adoptive parents and adoption agencies first, and sometimes exclusively. Adult adoptees are often invisible in media stories about adoption; this needs to change.
There are plenty of adult adoptees available to share their insights, experiences, and expertise. We adoptive parents and others in the adoption community need to promote their voices whenever possible, including in the media.
The Nanchang Project, among the very first to share news of China’s decision, is “the only search organization focused on reconnecting international Chinese adoptees with their birth families that is also co-led by both adoptees and adoptive parents.” They are moving, as is true for similar organizations, to being entirely adoptee-led.
From their recent blog post “End of an Era: China’s International Adoption Program”: “This sudden announcement prompted a range of emotions rippling through our community of Chinese adoptees, adoptive families, and prospective adoptive parents. At Nanchang Project, it is our profound hope that the remaining children in China receive the attention, medical care, and love they deserve. As for our fellow adoptees interested in their origins, we do not know how or if this will impact orphanage visits or appointments to check original adoption files.”
The blog post includes comments by some 30 Chinese adoptees in reaction to China’s decision. They express a wide variety of perspectives, a wide range of emotions.
Navigating_Adoption is the site of two Chinese adoptees, sharing stories and providing advocacy and awareness. From their Instagram post: “We want to continue to take time and space for those who are grieving and processing everything. We understand that people have different emotions about this, and it’s okay. We are here for our Chinese Adoptee community and our adoption community.”
On September 17, Navigating_Adoption is hosting “an adoptee-led, adoptee-only discussion on China’s recent end to International Adoption. This event is open to all adoptees, not just those of Chinese descent. We ask that adoptive parents do not attend this event so that we may create a safe space for adoptees to talk about their emotions during this time.”
WHEN: Tuesday, September 17, 2024 at 6:30 pm EST
WHERE: This discussion group will take place on Zoom
HOW: You can register for this event via their Instagram page.
Asian Adoptees of Canada posted this on their Instagram page: “In light of the recent news of China ending its international adoption program, Asian Adoptees of Canada would like to hold space for adult adoptees of any background to be in community during this time. We invite you to join our upcoming Open Dialogue event to connect, share, and/or listen,” on September 19.
*Event Details*
Date: Thursday, September 19, 2024
Time: 4:00 pm PST / 5:00 pm MST / 7:00 pm EST
Location: Zoom Meeting
Attendees: Adult adoptees of any background
To RSVP, email: president@asianadoptees.ca
Deadline to RSVP: Wednesday, September 18, 2024″
Patrick Armstrong, @PatrickintheWorld, is a Korean adoptee, podcaster, and speaker who posted on Instagram about China’s closing here. Listen to his thoughts, and be sure to read the comments, many from Chinese adoptees.
Patrick’s post included this helpful list:
“Here are some Chinese adoptees, orgs, and others that I’ve learned a lot from 🫶🏼
@nanchangproject
@chineseadopteealliance
@adopteesborninchinapodcast
@redthreadbroken
@lindsgeier
@adopteelilly
@kiraomans
@endlesswanderer
@lee_uhh
@adopteesofchina
@cosetteeisenhauer“
While I haven’t seen anything from her yet about China’s closing, Grace Newton, MSW, a Chinese adoptee and Ph.D. student, writes a highly regarded blog called Red Thread Broken. She was recently featured on the wonderful podcast AdopteesOn.
China’s Children International “empowers Chinese adoptees from all over the world by providing an inclusive and supportive community for all of us who share this common beginning.” They have an Instagram post titled “The End of Intercountry Adoption from China.”
Grace Yung Foster, a Korean adoptee and founder of the Inclusion Initiative, notes that “transnational/intercountry adoption is more complicated than it appears at face value. And regardless of China’s economic motives, it’s important to look at how transnational adoption impacts the people at the very center of it, the Adoptees.” See the rest of her post here: “An (Adoptee’s) Perspective on China’s Newest Adoption Policy.“
If you’re not following the Harlow’s Monkey, you should. JaeRan Kim, Ph.D., an associate professor at University of Washington-Tacoma and a Korean adoptee, began writing the blog in 2006. Her most recent post is “Reflection—it’s the end of the (transnational adoption) world as we know it.” In the post, JaeRan discusses both China’s decision to end intercountry adoptions and South Korea’s repot from their Truth and Reconciliation Commission about corruption in the Korean adoption system.
CCAI, an adoption agency founded by two Chinese immigrants, Joshua Zhong and Lily Nie, has placed over 13,000 Chinese children in adoptive homes. It is the largest adoption agency placing Chinese children, though it now has programs in other countries as well. Several dozen families have received invitations to travel to China to meet the child with whom they’ve been matched, though it looks like those meetings will not happen. CCAI and the National Council for Adoption are urging Congress to have the State Department get clarification on waiting/matched families to adopt from China. Read CCAI’s blog post here.
Holt International, an Oregon-based adoption agency, has placed some 7,700 Chinese children with U.S. families. In their announcement about China’s closing, they offer support services to adoptees and families.
Many adoption agencies have posted about China’s announcement. The ones I have seen are largely about families who had been waiting to adopt children from China, some for years. If you read those articles, you’ll note that there are frequently no adult adoptees included to provide their perspectives, This New York Times article, for example, about the impact of the closing, included no Chinese adoptees. It did include Chinese academics, a Korean-Danish adoptee, and prospective American adoptive parents.
The reactions to China’s closing are many and multi-faceted, including among adoptees. That range of reactions shows the complexity of adoption itself. May we continue to hear the voices of adopted people.



