A general consensus these days is that adoptees are the experts in adoption, that their lived experience is a (if not the) most valid and valuable construct for understanding adoption. I agree. I may have my own insights and perspectives as an adoptive parent, but only adopted people know the depth and breadth of the reality of being adopted.
What, then, does it mean to be “adoption competent”?
It is a term mostly applied to therapy and therapists.
According to the Child Welfare Information Gateway of the U.S. government, “Children and youth who are adopted often have experienced trauma and need help sorting through complicated feelings stemming from their adoption and past experiences. Rather than being a one-time event, adoption is an ongoing process that requires continuous support long after papers are signed. To provide that support, child welfare professionals and other service providers should have adoption competence—the specific knowledge, skills, and values required to meet the complex, unique needs of adopted children and youth and their families.” (I added the emphasis.)
The notion of therapists and others to be “adoption competent” has been around for a while, including via the National Child Welfare Resource Center for Adoption (NCWRCA)’s Guide to Developing an Adoption Certificate Program for Mental Health Practitioners, published in 2007.
In 2013, the Donaldson Adoption Institute funded a policy paper, “A Need to Know: Enhancing Adoption Competence Among Adoption Professionals.”
Fast forward to the relative present time. The program that shows up most in a search for “adoption competence” is from the Center for Adoption Support and Education (C.A.S.E.): “The Training for Adoption Competency (TAC) Curriculum is the nation’s premiere assessment-based certificate program for training mental health practitioners and developing adoption competency skills…TAC has 19 training centers across the country, over 1,800 graduates (and growing) and received accreditation from the Institute of Credentialing Excellence (ICE), making it a recognized top-tier program dedicated to public protection and excellence in practice.”
It was offered for free to practitioners in Washington state in 2022-2023, where I live, as part of the Coordinated Care health insurance program. Costs currently seem to vary nationally from $900 to $3500, according to my brief search for the numbers.
I’d like to suggest that the TAC program be offered free to adult adoptees who are eligible as therapists, and would otherwise be charged for the program. That would be a powerful acknowledgment to the value of adoptee voices, a gesture of not charging them nor requesting free labor from them.
While there is a charge for TAC, C.A.S.E. also offers three NTI courses for free, as part, I’d guess of the $9 million grant they were awarded. “NTI was developed by the Center for Adoption Support and Education (C.A.S.E.) and funded through a $9 million cooperative agreement with the Children’s Bureau (Administration on Children and Families, US Dept of Health and Human Services) with the goal of providing free access to NTI in all U.S. states, tribes and territories.”
The three courses are geared toward child welfare workers (case workers), child welfare supervisors, and mental health professionals.
I recently completed the National Adoption Competency Mental Health Training for Child Welfare Professionals. As an adoptive parent, as someone who worked in adoption professionally, as a consultant now for Adoption Mosaic, I was curious about the course. It took me well over 20 hours lol. I will share my thoughts on the course, as well as on “adoption competent therapists,” in a separate blog post.
I would urge others to take the course, as a way of seeing what current thinking appears to be around adoption competency.
It is an evolving concept at best. And I wish my adoption agency social workers and I had some of this information when I adopted my children some 35+ years ago. We keep learning.
Full disclosure: I worked with C.A.S.E. some 25 years ago, including helping with the writing of the W.I.S.E. Up! book and of a foster care-related grant, the exact name of which I cannot recall now. This post is not meant as an advertisement or endorsement or criticism of the TAC program or C.A.S.E. courses. Indeed, there are mixed reviews from a number of practitioners, inevitable when thousands of folks have undergone the training. That said, TAC from C.A.S.E., for whatever combination of reasons, is what shows up in volume on Internet searches.

