Is there a perfect storm brewing that signals the end of international adoptions?
What would that mean for children who are genuine orphans, who need safe families, who have medical conditions that are untreatable in their home country?
Some facts/omens/bellwethers:
(1) International adoption has been on the wane for about a decade. Priceonomics published an overview asking “Why Did International Adoption Suddenly End?” It hasn’t ended, but it has definitively declined.
According to the Priceonomics article, he US, Canada, several western European countries, and Australia/New Zealand received some 40,000 children for international adoption each year from 2003 to 2007. In 2012, the global total was under 20,000. The decline has been significant around the world.
(2) This week, an advisory group for the Dutch government said that “The Netherlands should stop allowing people to adopt children from abroad because it is not in the best interests of the child.” New recommendations state that “the interests of the child should always be paramount and these are better served if the child grows up in their own country with their own culture. Instead, more should be done to help the child’s biological parents ensure continuity of care.” Read the article from Dutch News here.
The Netherlands adopted about 1200 children annually in the early 2000’s. In 2015, the total was 304, of whom 37 were from the United States, according to the US State Department FY 2015 report, Table 3.
Th Netherlands’ consideration of this approach is a big development, and one that bears monitoring closely.
(3) International adult adoptees have gone to court to annul their adoptions. Read more here.
(4) US adoption agencies have had their Hague accreditation status permanently suspended. One US agency has been indicted for fraud and conspiracy by the US Department of Justice; the staff people pled guilty and are awaiting sentencing.
(5) The US State Department has proposed new rules regarding intercountry adoption. Their summary: “The Department of State (the Department) proposes to amend requirements for accreditation of agencies and approval of persons to provide adoption services in intercountry adoption cases. The proposed rule includes a new subpart establishing parameters for U.S. accrediting entities to authorize adoption service providers who have received accreditation or approval to provide adoption services in countries designated by the Secretary, which will be known as “country-specific authorization” (CSA). Adoption service providers will only be permitted to act as primary providers in a CSA-designated country if they have received CSA for that particular country.
The proposed rule also strengthens certain standards for accreditation and approval, including those related to fees and the use of foreign providers. In addition, the proposed rule enhances standards related to preparation of prospective adoptive parents so that they receive more training related to the most common challenges faced by adoptive families, and are better prepared for the needs of the specific child they are adopting. These proposed changes are intended to align the preparation of prospective adoptive parents with the current demographics of children immigrating to the United States through intercountry adoption. Finally, the proposed rule makes the mechanism to submit complaints about adoption service providers available to complainants even if they have not first addressed their complaint directly with the adoption service provider.”
(6) Adoption agencies are pushing back against the proposed new rules. The National Council For Adoption has information here.
International adoption is an enormous, complicated issue. The convergence of children, money, reproductive rights, bureaucracy, international and state laws, money, race, immigration, economic inequity, health care access, and money is overwhelming. There are folks who see adoption as nothing less than trafficking. There are folks who just want to give a child a home. There are adult adoptees who are increasingly vocal on social media and in books, articles, and podcasts about their realities. We rarely hear from first/birth parents about their perspectives, but when we do, it’s often heartbreaking.
So what to do? Even if international adoption continues to decline, there will be children in need. Adoption may be a solution for some of them, but the costs and the controversies are daunting. I’ve made suggestions here: Lamenting the Decline in International Adoptions? Take Action.
And keep an eye on the brewing storm.
Pingback: If COA Stops Accrediting Adoption Agencies, Will International Adoptions End to the USA? | Light of Day Stories
Never has Intercountry adoption really adressed the needs of the vast majority of children in a crisis situation. The financial resources being pumped into Intercountry adoptions are staggering. The overhead costs, tax payers money, excluding the dutch contributions to are Hague Conference, are 5.5 Million Euros.
This is obviously disproportionate.
Without the direct and indirect state subsidies, intercountry adoption would have long been dead. It s actually plain corrupt.
Next to zero taxpayers money is being spent on assisting adult adoptees to cope with the complex situation. No money at all is being put for example in assisting with searches.
The scandals in the Netherlands, India, China, Ethiopia, Haiti, Colombia, Uganda are all unadressed. No justice for the victims.
The experts, the scientists are part of the industrial complex.
Here is the english summary of the report. It is indeed significant. Most interestingly it is in the same lines as what the EU did regarding Romania.
http://www.againstchildtrafficking.org/2016/11/english-summary-of-dutch-report-on-intercountry-adoption/