On December 6, 2013, 23andMe posted a notice saying they are suspending health-related genetic tests to comply with the FDA’s regulatory review. People who bought the tests before November 22, 2013, will still have access to their results. 23andMe hopes to offer health-related results in the future. The ancestry-related genetic tests and raw genetic data will still be available now. Click here for the complete notice.
On one level, the many genetic testing and ancestry services that currently exist are amazing and are opening incredible doors. For a good overview of Genomic Testing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, click here.
On another level, the first solution should be access to original birth certificates (OBCs) that would allow adopted people the basic civil right to know their own histories. (I’ve written about the need for OBC access here.)
Until our legislators come to their senses and allow adoptees this basic human right, genetic technology at least sheds some light on otherwise dark corners.
I’ve written several times about DNA testing and its value to adoptees, first/birth parents, and others who have gaps in their histories. You can read “DNA, Pandora’s Box, and Answers?”, “DNA Testing, Adoption, and Outrage,” and DNA Testing and Adoption: Filling In Many Missing Pieces.”
One of the most popular services, 23andme, provides a range of services related to genetics. As the website says, you can discover your ancestral origins and trace your lineage and find out what percentage of your DNA comes from populations around the world (East Asian, sub-Saharan African, British Isles, etc.). There is a family tree tool that allows connection with genetically-related relatives, and some astonishing connections among first/birth families have been made that way.
23andMe also allows you to find out inherited traits (such as lactose intolerance and male pattern baldness), carrier status of certain diseases (for example, cancer), health risks, and drug responses. It doesn’t include all diseases or all health risks, but it does provide some substantial information.
As a result of the genetic health testing service, 23andMe recently received a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration.
You can see the complete letter here.
Here is an excerpt:
“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is sending you this letter because you are marketing the 23andMe Saliva Collection Kit and Personal Genome Service (PGS) without marketing clearance or approval in violation of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)…
…The risk of serious injury or death is known to be high when patients are either non-compliant or not properly dosed; combined with the risk that a direct-to-consumer test result may be used by a patient to self-manage, serious concerns are raised if test results are not adequately understood by patients or if incorrect test results are reported.”
Health literacy is an issue in America, where people fail to follow instructions, misunderstand dosage, or get confused about a diagnosis. I’m sure there is some validity to the FDA’s position, though I also believe that most people who would use 23andMe would also consult with a doctor, who would then order additional tests.
Many 23andMe lawyers have no doubt been working hard in response to the letter. The information on the web page currently is vague:
23andMe Statement Regarding FDA Warning Letter
“We have received the warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration. We recognize that we have not met the FDA’s expectations regarding timeline and communication regarding our submission. Our relationship with the FDA is extremely important to us and we are committed to fully engaging with them to address their concerns.”
A New Yorker article this week notes that “many doctors who want medically relevant genetic information about a patient get that information by asking her to sign up with 23andMe. Meanwhile, this company’s cheap, widespread testing, which has gathered genetic, ancestry, and health data from nearly five hundred thousand people, has created a rich medical source of risk information.”
It’s been a huge source of information for adopted adults and for first/birth families in terms of creating connections, as well as allowing them to fill in previously missing information on medical forms. “Unknown” is no fun to post on a medical history.
At this point, 23andMe is still taking orders for its kits, still posting numerous disclaimers about test results, and still urging consumers to see their doctors. Lawyers are looking into their response to the FDA. A change.org petition has been started. A petition to the White House is up and running. 23andMe has 15 working days from November 22 to respond to the FDA letter.
In addition to 23andMe, here are some other sites to explore and consider:
Let’s hope that 23andMe will be allowed to continue safely providing this revolutionary, life-changing service, to those who have few other options of accessing medical information. Let’s hope that other accurate, cost-effective services become available as well.
And let’s continue to work toward adoptees having access to both their original birth certificates and their own medical history.
I’m the odd man out in the uproar over this – I think it is high time seeing as the rest of the medical community has been actively asking the FDA to stop the way they are marketing this for close to ten years now, because some of it isn’t up to standards.
While I think that the ancestry and that side of the testing is good…not so much on the medical side for many reasons, including – lack of knowledge by the consumer on both the at risk/not at risk aspect, the current doctors don’t have the training needed, not all the gene(s) and gene interactions have been identified (just a minute fraction) – nor what combination of different genes turn on, or off the risk of that gene. Not to mention that they just found out the 98% (?) of our dna they call “junk dna” – isn’t junk after all.
It’s too soon into this to use it as a be all, and end all, and some will see it that way – and that is dangerous. I think it is better than nothing but…a bit but…it would not have predicted what would happen to me because in the ten years of looking for the gene or genes- they still haven’t found them and there are thousands of genetic diseases that the genes haven’t been identified for. It’s a start but people may put too much faith on it and that is very concerning.
As you noted – changing the laws that denied us the right to know who were are must stay as top priority, then those who want to know can ask for it – the best defense is knowing how a disease shows in your specific family.